🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."