🔗 Share this article

The movie boasts a talented cast, telling the real-life story of coach Ingle, who mentored a brash Sheffield teenager from Middle Eastern migrant family. Known as Naseem Hamed, the fighter was taught to confront racist bullies and molded into a celebrity world champion in the late 90s. Ingle cultivated his flamboyant arrogance and lethal fists, but after achieving wealth, the boxer turned against his coach, cutting him out and making him a mix of John Falstaff and Broadway Danny Rose.

Cast and Characters

Brosnan plays Ingle; Amir El-Masry takes on the role of the prince, and Toby Stephens appears as the assertive promoter Frank Warren, who recognized the goldmine that the coach had discovered.

Film’s Shortcomings

However, the movie honestly misses the fighter’s agility: the boxing sequences flow well, but the crucial story in between is consistently flat and monotonous. It lacks nuance or contrast in the depiction of the protagonist himself, and the actor, an otherwise excellent talent, doesn’t get the opportunity to display any subtlety or much of what might make his role truly engaging – even though he’s obviously been working out and appears convincing in the ring.

Dialogue and Music Issues

The drama is often lumbered with utilitarian, explanatory lines that tell you exactly what is going on and what we are meant to feel (“Your journey began your boxing journey at seven years old …”). It is the kind of script that digital producers call “second-screen”, ensuring you know what’s unfolding while you’re watching the film but also checking your phone. Additionally, the background music is overbearing, sometimes almost deafening, particularly in the moment where the boxer gets overexcited visiting Warren in his palatial home.

Acting and Pivotal Scenes

Although the leads do their very best, their dynamic never really ignites, and the big set-piece fight scenes are often anticlimactically truncated. The most important moment is surely when, provoked past his limit in the training facility one day by Hamed as a delusional “old man”, Ingle in fact offers to get in the ring and box him. Everyone in the room is shocked and uncomfortable. In what way is this extremely risky standoff going to unfold? What will be the ending? Certainly the champion is going to defeat him? Alternatively will he sentimentally pull his punches? The resolution remains ambiguous.

Highlights and Humor

This isn’t to imply that there are no some good moments. The actor elicits humor when Ingle informs a reporter what he’s instructing the youths from his neighborhood: to oppose bias and when you meet a offender, “Hit them in the bollocks”. Amusing too when the boxer fidgets at the ridiculous antics Ingle makes him do in the beginning: posing as the “beast from the East”.

Storyline and Final Thoughts

Regarding the rift, the film depicts this as being worsened by a revealing publication that the trainer is allegedly written (a story element evidently adapted from prior material), and there is an interestingly imagined last discussion – however the emotional tribute that the boxer is supposed to have paid to his mentor after his death is only referenced in the end titles, and not dramatised on film. Some interesting material in this film, but the blows don’t land.

Giant was shown at the festival and is in British and Irish theaters from 9 January.